The Author expresses his dissent with the common view held by various authors, including M. Pivetti, that Sraffa’s PRODUCTION OF COMMODITIES BY MEANS OF COMMODITIES contains a specific theory of income distribution. The Author believes that Sraffa was concerned with the foundations of a theory of income distribution, not with any specific theory that may be laid on those foundations. Furthermore, Sraffa was basically concerned with rejecting the marginalist approach to income distribution and with going back to the ‘standpoint of the old Classical economists’
The relationships between the classical and neoclassical theories are much more complex that the neo...
In this rejoinder to de Vivo’s comment on Gehrke and Kurz (2018, ‘Sraffa’s constructive and interpre...
I have worked for many years on the theory of rent and income distribution in multisector scheme app...
Income distribution is one of the fields in which Sraffa’s 1960 book has given rise, since its publi...
This is a comment on Nuno Martins’ review article of my book: A Revolution in Economic Theory: The E...
In a recent article in Capital and C/ass, Savran (1979, p. 131) argues that '... Sraffa's ...
Abstract This comment from Fratini's article “Rent as a share of product and Sraffa's price equation...
The subtitle of Sraffa's most celebrated work, Production of Commodities by Means of Commodities, is...
This paper considers whether, as suggested by Roncaglia (1978), there exists, in how they relate to ...
The Author responds to Eygelshoven and Kuipers (1981) criticism regarding an assertion made by the A...
The subtitle of Sraffa’s most celebrated work, Production of Commodities by Means of Commodities, i...
Sungur Savran has argued in a recent paper (1979) that Sraffa's analysis (1960) is internally i...
In his Cambridge lectures, Sraffa criticised Marshall’s theory on the basis of the recognition of th...
Discussion of interpretations of Sraffa's thought in particular the role of Marx in the genesis of P...
In this rejoinder to de Vivos comment on Gehrke and Kurz (2018, ‘Sraffas constructive and interpreti...
The relationships between the classical and neoclassical theories are much more complex that the neo...
In this rejoinder to de Vivo’s comment on Gehrke and Kurz (2018, ‘Sraffa’s constructive and interpre...
I have worked for many years on the theory of rent and income distribution in multisector scheme app...
Income distribution is one of the fields in which Sraffa’s 1960 book has given rise, since its publi...
This is a comment on Nuno Martins’ review article of my book: A Revolution in Economic Theory: The E...
In a recent article in Capital and C/ass, Savran (1979, p. 131) argues that '... Sraffa's ...
Abstract This comment from Fratini's article “Rent as a share of product and Sraffa's price equation...
The subtitle of Sraffa's most celebrated work, Production of Commodities by Means of Commodities, is...
This paper considers whether, as suggested by Roncaglia (1978), there exists, in how they relate to ...
The Author responds to Eygelshoven and Kuipers (1981) criticism regarding an assertion made by the A...
The subtitle of Sraffa’s most celebrated work, Production of Commodities by Means of Commodities, i...
Sungur Savran has argued in a recent paper (1979) that Sraffa's analysis (1960) is internally i...
In his Cambridge lectures, Sraffa criticised Marshall’s theory on the basis of the recognition of th...
Discussion of interpretations of Sraffa's thought in particular the role of Marx in the genesis of P...
In this rejoinder to de Vivos comment on Gehrke and Kurz (2018, ‘Sraffas constructive and interpreti...
The relationships between the classical and neoclassical theories are much more complex that the neo...
In this rejoinder to de Vivo’s comment on Gehrke and Kurz (2018, ‘Sraffa’s constructive and interpre...
I have worked for many years on the theory of rent and income distribution in multisector scheme app...